Category Archives: Uncategorized

MY WORK ON THE TWO AGES (Part 1)

PMW 2026-065 by Kenneth L. Gentry, Jr.

In this short series I will introduce my reasoning for my currently working on  a book on the two age doctrine of redemptive history. I will begin this series with an important issue which forms a necessary backdrop to understanding the two age doctrine:

The unity of the Bible

The Bible is the divinely-ordained collection of sixty-six books which were directly revealed by God’s Holy Spirit for his own glory and the benefit of man (1 Pet. 1:10–12; 2 Pet. 1:20–21). Yet despite the Bible’s collective nature it is fundamentally one book. The very word biblios is a word in the singular form that signifies the unified nature of Scripture. Commenting on 1 Peter 1:10–12 and citing WCF 1:5, Richard Gaffin (2023: 49) argues that the “overarching activity of the Spirit explains why in the Old Testament as such ‘the consent of all the parts, the scope of the whole’ is present and discoverable. The multi-authored diversity and varied genre of the Old Testament constitute an organically unfolding and divinely determined didactic unity.” Continue reading

OLIVET’S TWO QUESTIONS (2)

PMW 2026-057 by Kenneth L. Gentry, Jr.

I am continuing my presentation of the evidence that the Disciples of Christ ask him two questions in Matthew 24:3, not three questions. See preceding posting.

Eighth, disciples’ confusion tendencies. In their question the disciples confound two separate issues. In their interaction with Jesus in Matthew 24:1–3, their tendency to confusion leads them to associate the destruction of the temple with “your parousia and the end of the age.” And this despite the fact that they had already heard from the Lord that “the end of the age” was the end of time brought about with the final judgment (Matt. 13:39, 40, 49). Of course, the implied reader would also know of Jesus’ soon-coming great commission reaching to “the end of the age” (Matt. 28:20). And the disciples’ confusion on this matter becomes even more evident to us in that Jesus’ prophetic statement (which gives rise to the disciples’ question) focuses solely on the temple’s destruction. Continue reading

OLIVET’S TWO QUESTIONS (1)

PMW 2026-056 by Kenneth L. Gentry, Jr.

The Olivet Dscsourse is prompted by the Disciples questioning Jesus about his prophesying the destruction of the temple (Matt. 24:2–3). It is important to understand their questions in order to follow Jesus’ answer. I believe the evidence is clear that they ask only two questions, not three (as per John Walvoord and some others). The exegetical support for the two-question view is as follows.

First, lexical observation. Lexically the disciples’ questions present only two interrogatives, not three. They ask “when” (Gk., pote) and “what” (Gk., ti): “when [pote] will these things happen, and what [ti] will be the sign of Your coming, and of the end of the age? Continue reading

TEN THINGS POSTMILLENNIALISTS BELIEVE

PMW 2026-020 by Greg L. Bahnsen

Gentry note: This article is clipped from Greg L. Bahnsen’s postmillennial work Victory in Jesus. It is a helpful summary of some of the key features of the postmillennial hope. Dr. Bahnsen was an American Calvinist philosopher and Christian apologist. He was a minister in the Orthodox Presbyterian Church and a full-time Scholar in Residence for the Southern California Center for Christian Studies (SCCCS). He is also considered a leading contributor to the field of Christian apologetics, as he popularized the presuppositional method of Cornelius Van Til.

The following is from pp. 40–44 of his book:

1. As postmillennialists we champion the inspiration, infallibility and we read the newspaper — this should be obvious. When we read the newspapers how could we possibly have this kind of hope? We do not have it be cause the world is going so well.

Continue reading

HODGE ON ROMANS 11

PMW 2026-018 by Charles Hodge

Romans 11:25–26 is a passage that is helpful for supporting the postmillennial hope. Perhaps the best exposition is that by John Murray in his commentary on Romans. In this article, however, I will post Charles Hodge’s view, which comports well with Murray’s.

I will alter Hodge’s passages in only four minor ways: (1) I will break up his statements in a more modern style, making it more easily accessible. I will, however, maintain Hodge’s words as they appear in the text. (2) I will transliterate his Greek into English. (3) I will change his punctuation to a more modern style. For example, he sometimes puts commas and semi-colons within a parenthesis, whereas today they are properly placed outside of it. (4) I will replace Roman numerals with Arabic numerals. I do this because there are II kinds of people in the world: those who understand Roman numerals and those who don’t. I want to minister to all people by this change!

Let’s get started with Hodge’s argument. All that follows is Hodge’s own presentation. Continue reading

REDEMPTIVE GRACE

PMW 2026:015 by Kenneth L. Gentry, Jr.

The word “grace” in the Bible is not always used as a redemptive term. In fact, neither does it always bear the same basic meaning (e.g., it can mean attractive, gift, or thanks).

THE FACT OF REDEMPTIVE GRACE

Nevertheless, the most important idea involved in grace in its most widely used meaning speaks of an active favor or good will extended from one person to another, whether from God to man (Gen 6:8; Exo 34:9) or from man to man (Gen 33:15; 1 Sam 1:18). Fundamental to this meaning of grace is that it involves a benefit that is freely given in kindness to another who has no claim on the giver.

We find a general use of the term “grace” that clearly exhibits this significance in Lot’s experience. Genesis uses the Hebrew for “grace” in Lot’s response to one of the angels who come to escort him to safety before God destroys Sodom (Gen 19:15–17). In Genesis 19:19 we read of Lot’s thankful recognition of the angel’s display of grace: “Now behold, your servant has found favor in your sight, and you have magnified your lovingkindness, which you have shown me by saving my life.”

But the grace in which we are interested is the grace of God in salvation. The general idea of grace is gloriously magnified in his specific saving mercy in behalf of the sinner.

God’s redemptive grace is his unmerited work in behalf of sinners, by which they receive the benefit of forgiveness of sin and eternal salvation from God’s judgment.


1 John: Salvation, Heresy, Assurance
20 downloadable mp3 sermons by Ken Gentry
First John is a much neglected epistle that deals with crucial issues: it explains salvation, warns against heresy, and demonstrates the assurance of salvation. Very helpful, especially for new Christians.
See more study materials at: www.KennethGentry.com


Indeed, as theologian Louis Berkhof explains: “grace is an attribute of God, one of the divine perfections. It is God’s free, sovereign, undeserved favour or love to man, in his state of sin and guilt, which manifests itself in the forgiveness of sin and deliverance from its penalty.”

Because of man’s sin (see ch 2) he deserves God’s wrath, yet because of God’s grace he receives God’s blessing. As Peter expresses it to his audience: God saves man from his sin because he is “the God of all grace, who has called you to His eternal glory in Christ” (1 Pet 5:10). In salvation Christ, the Son of God, stands in for the sinner and endures God’s righteous judgment upon sin, so that the sinner himself may be saved. This is why God turns his face from Christ as he suffers on the cross (Matt 27:46).

For instance, in 2 Corinthians 5:21 we read that God “made Him who knew no sin to be sin on our behalf, so that we might become the righteousness of God in Him.” Paul teaches us that Christ “was delivered over because of our transgressions” (Rom 4:25; cp. Rom 8:32; Gal 2:20; Eph 5:2). Indeed, he states that “Christ redeemed us from the curse of the Law, having become a curse for us” (Gal 3:13).

But there is more.

God’s saving grace is not only granted to the undeserving but to the ill-deserving. That is, we should not illustrate God’s grace in salvation as being like someone giving a gift to a homeless person, i.e., the undeserving. Rather it is better to picture it as someone giving a gift to a homeless person after the homeless person has viciously attacked him, i.e., to the ill-deserving. Grace is undeserved favor for the ill-deserving sinner.

So then, as we should understand from our earlier study of sin, we are sinners who deserve the opposite of God’s favor: we deserve his wrath. For “God demonstrates His own love toward us, in that while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us” (Rom 5:8). Indeed, Christ “died for the ungodly” (Rom 5:6). Because of its theological usage, the English word “grace” has served as a useful acronym for God’s saving love for sinners: God’s Riches At Christ’s Expense.

As a consequence of God’s saving grace, Paul can write that “having been justified by faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ, through whom also we have obtained our introduction by faith into this grace in which we stand; and we exult in hope of the glory of God” (Rom 5:1–2). Thus, simply put, the “gospel” (literally: “good news”) is “the gospel of the grace of God” (Acts 20:24). We truly “receive the abundance of grace and of the gift of righteousness . . . through the One, Jesus Christ” (Rom 5:17).


Christ’s Church (20 mp3 downloads)
by Ken Gentry
An in-depth sermonic presentation of the doctrine of the church. This is vitally important today with the evangelical church not living up to its biblical calling
See more study materials at: www.KennethGentry.com


But now let us consider:

THE BEGINNING OF REDEMPTIVE GRACE

To better understand the glory of God as a gracious Redeemer, we must once again look back to the beginning. For immediately upon Adam’s fall into sin (bringing corruption into man’s being and ruin into his history), God promises redemption. Thus, God dramatically exhibits his grace by exercising it in the very historical context of man’s rebellion.

Even as God calls down his curse upon Satan, Adam, and Eve, he promises a coming Redeemer for man. In Genesis 3:15 we read God’s curse upon Satan which simultaneously presents his blessing upon man: “I will put enmity Between you and the woman, / And between your seed and her seed; / He shall bruise you on the head, / And you shall bruise him on the heel.” In these words we may discern several important truths.

First, we see that because of his sin and the enmity of Satan, man must expect conflict in history. This brief prophecy presents us with a mighty, history-long struggle between the serpent’s seed and the woman’s seed. The tranquility in Eden has been breached and the turbulence in history has begun. We see the immediate results of this conflict in Eve’s firstborn son, Cain, killing her second son, Abel (Gen 4:1–8). This murderous hostility continues as we see in Lamech (Gen 4:23–24), in Noah’s day (Gen 6:5), and throughout Scripture. It becomes so bad that God says “I will blot out man whom I have created . . , for I am sorry that I have made them” (Gen 6:7).

But, second, we see that God presents two seed lines that will engage the struggle in history. The word for “seed” here “can refer to an immediate descendant (Gen. 4:25; 15:3), a distant offspring [Gal 3:16, 19], or a rather large group of descendants [Gen 22:17; Psa 105:6]. Here and throughout Scripture, all three senses are developed and merged in tracing this concept. In our Genesis text we can infer both the single and collective senses.”


God Gave Wine (by Ken Gentry)

A biblical defense of moderate alcohol consumption. Considers all key biblical passages and engages the leading objections.

See more study materials at: www.KennethGentry.com


The two seed lines which are traced throughout Scripture are the seed of the serpent and the seed of the woman. The seed of the serpent is not a literal lineage, but a spiritual line of people who follow Satan’s original rebellion against God: this line includes all the non-elect (Matt 13:38; John 8:44). The seed of the woman involves both a literal singular seed (Christ) and a spiritual corporate seed which follows God’s original intention for Eve: they are the elect (John 1:12; 11:52; 1 John 3:1–2).

After Cain slays Abel we read of the birth of Seth’s son, Enosh. There we discover that “then men began to call upon the name of the LORD” (Gen 4:26). John presents these antithetical seed lines as “the children of God and the children of the devil” (1 John 3:8, cp. Matt 13:48; John 8:44; 1 John 3:10).

The ultimate individual, literal seed of the woman is Jesus Christ, the Redeemer of God’s elect. “When the fullness of the time came, God sent forth His Son, born of a woman, born under the Law, so that He might redeem those who were under the Law, that we might receive the adoption as sons “ (Gal 4:4–5). Luke traces Jesus’ genealogy from Mary back to “the son of Enosh, the son of Seth, the son of Adam, the son of God” (Luke 3:38).

Third, the seed of the woman (Christ) will conquer the seed of the serpent (Satan). Though Satan will bruise his heel (a painful wound), Christ will crush his head (a mortal blow). Despite Satan’s attempt to corrupt mankind and destroy God’s work, God here promises to send a Redeemer who will conquer him by means of his redemptive grace. God’s seed will secure victory in history.

Thus, the prophecy in Genesis 3:15 is theologically called the “protoevangelium,” the first promise (“proto”) of the gospel (“evangelium”) and its victory in history. In fact, it is the first prophecy in Scripture and it points to the coming of our Redeemer, Jesus Christ the Son of God in whom he is well-pleased (Matt 3:16; 17:5). God is indeed a gracious Redeemer.


God's Law Made Easy 2019

God’s Law Made Easy

(by Kenneth Gentry)

Summary for the case for the continuing relevance of God’s Law. A helpful summary of the argument from Greg L. Bahnsen’s Theonomy in Christian Ethics.

See more study materials at: www.KennethGentry.com


POSTMILLENNIALISM

PMW 2025-089 by Barry Cooper (of Ligonier)

Gentry note:
From time-to-time I like to present postmillennial articles from other writers. This one is brief but to the point. It was published on Ligonier’s website last year. I am glad postmillennialism is still alive and well at Ligonier.

If you’re a follower of Christ, how optimistic are you about the future of this world we’re living in?

Many of us seem to grow more disillusioned about the prospects as we grow older. And I have to say, this is only amplified if you’re English. For nearly half a century now, I’ve watched our national team get repeatedly knocked out of major sporting tournaments on penalties, so in general, the English psyche has been carefully conditioned to always expect the worst. Our natural, ingrained tendency leans toward the pessimistic. Continue reading