Category Archives: Culture

SHOULD WE VOTE LESSER OF EVILS? (4)

PMW 2026-025 by Kenneth L. Gentry, Jr.

This is my final posting on the question of voting for the lesser of evils. The earlier postings should be read in order to understand this one. But now, how does all of my argument thus far square with:

The Question of Scripture

I believe in a Christian worldview rooted in Scripture. But how can we encourage Christians to compromise in their voting while maintaining their worldview? The question of compromise is particularly significant for Christians who are uncompromisingly committed to Scripture. So then, does the question of compromise undermine all the practical arguments brought up by Christian idealists?

This is an important matter to consider — especially in that it frequently arises in Christian political discussions. Does the Bible have anything to say regarding the question of compromise? Actually it does. It allows realistic, principled compromise. Consider the following examples.

Continue reading

SHOULD WE VOTE LESSER OF EVILS? (3)

PMW 2026-024 by Kenneth L. Gentry, Jr.

This is my third in a short series on the question as to whether or not Christians should vote for the lesser-of-evils. We are now ready for the important question regarding the evaluation of our principles.

Third, evaluating our principles. We are considering political issues in this book, and are especially focusing on voting as an important political act that Christians should pursue. As believers we often find ourselves and our principles under assault. One of our principles should be to strive to protect our other principles as best we can against the majority opposition. I am arguing that, given our circumstances, we sometimes have to act as principled realists and vote for the lesser of evils in defending our principles for the long haul. Just as freedoms may be lost incrementally, they may also be re-established incrementally.

Continue reading

SHOULD WE VOTE LESSER OF EVILS? (2)

PMW 2026-023 by Kenneth L. Gentry, Jr.

In my last article, I noted that we are in an election year in America, and that as Christians we need to consider political issues. But now I want to focus on the vitally important:

The Question of Principle

We need carefully to reflect on the question of principle itself, which I will do under several headings.

First, distinguishing our principles. When we are engaging in politics we must be careful not to place our political actions (e.g., voting) on the same level as our doctrinal commitments (i.e., faith in Scripture). We must be careful not to develop a messianic political outlook. That is, we should not believe that if we can only elect the right candidate he will save our nation.

This problem of viewing political principles as if they are on the same level as doctrinal convictions is quite widespread. For instance, consider the “Defending Contending” website cited above. Notice how the writer (“Pilgrim”) sets up the debate: “true Christians should not have to vote if they first have to sit down and estimate which candidate is the lesser of two evils.” This writer is classifying “true” Christians by their voting rather than by their doctrinal commitments and personal lifestyle. This type of thinking apparently believes that “by their votes you shall know them.”

Continue reading

SHOULD WE VOTE LESSER OF EVILS? (1)

PMW 2026-022 by Kenneth L. Gentry, Jr.

As we move closer to our important off-year elections, American Christians need to think carefully about the options before us. As postmillennialists we recognize that we are in a socio-political struggle. For the long run. Therefore, we must act accordingly. Like it or not, in politics we cannot expect overnight success through one particular election or by means of a “perfect” candidate. To continually vote for the “perfect” candidate when we know he is going to lose does not help us build for the future, for by that we are ceding more victories to the overt liberals. Liberalism is a mess. And when its goo gets all over the place, it is very difficult to clean up the mess.

Continue reading

BAD REASONS FOR AVOIDING POLITICS

PMW 2026-021 by Kenneth L. Gentry, Jr.

This is an election year for America. And Christians need to think about our political circumstances and duties. After all Christians should be committed to a holistic Christian worldview. And by the very nature of the case, a worldview must involve the “world.” And since politics is a large function in human society, you would think all Christians would recognize the importance of a Christian involvement in politics. But you would be wrong.

Many Christians discourage engagement in politics. In fact, they often attempt to use the Scripture to dissuade Christians from political endeavors and concerns. Others simply avoid political issues for one reason or another. Some of the leading complaints against a concern with or an involvement in politics are the following:

Continue reading

POSTMILLENNIALISM IN CREATION & FALL (2)

PMW 2026:014 by Kenneth L. Gentry, Jr.

This the second article in my study of postmillennialism in creation and fall. In my previous article I pointed out the significance of the sabbath principle that promises us divinely-ordained, glorious rest. But now we must look at exactly how this ultimate consummate rest impacts our understanding of postmillennial progress. This lead us to:

THE GRADUALISM PRINCIPLE

As I have shown, creation has a glorious goal: our ultimate rest will occur at the end of history. Yet we must see that it begins to transpire within history as God providentially moves history toward his ordained goal of rest. So as we consider how the postmillennial hope is impacted by this, we must understand how God created world.

Continue reading

OLD LAW IN THE NEW CREATION

Passing of earthPMW 2025-103 by Kenneth L. Gentry, Jr.

I often receive queries from folks who are thinking through the issue relative to the postmillennial hope. Though not all postmillennialists are theonomic, I am. I believe our hope leads to the expectation that God’s Law will prevail in the world.

Here is a series of emails I received from a reader.

Question 1:
I have a question for you that has bothered me off and on. As a partial preterist, I defend the interpretation of “New heavens and Earth” as the figurative establishment of the New Covenant and the passing away of the old heavens and earth as the passing of the Old Covenant. But as a reluctant theonomist, this puts pressure on my understanding of Matt 5:17 (Jesus saying that the Law will not pass away until the heavens and earth pass away). Continue reading