NEW CREATION IN 2 PETER

PMW 2026-011 by Daniel J. Ragusa

Gentry note:
This posting is an excerpt drawn from an excellent commentary on 2 Peter by Daniel J. Ragusa, Exploring 2 Peter: The Promise and the Path. To read his whole exposition, complete with footnotes omitted here (except for one note explaining what a “merism” is), you may purchase it as at: Reformed Forum.
https://reformedforum.org/product/exploring-2-peter-the-promise-and-the-path-redemptive-historical-bible-studies/

Now for Ragusa’s explanation of 2 Peter 3 and “the Day of the Lord” (pp. 113–118):

The Day of the Lord
Peter … describes what the day of the Lord will be like in [2 Peter] verse 10: “But the day of the Lord will come like a thief, and then the heavens will pass away with a roar, and the heavenly bodies [or elements, Gk. stoicheial will be burned up and dissolved, and the earth and the works that are done on it will be exposed.” We have already considered the Old Testament background to the day of the Lord as a day of finality and double features — punishment and deliverance, judgment and salvation. It “will come like a thief” in keeping with the sovereignty of the Lord of the promise over its fulfillment.

The thief image highlights the inevitability and suddenness of its dawn for the ungodly. According to verse 7, “the heavens and earth that now exist are stored up for fire, being kept until the day of judgment and the destruction of the ungodly.” While it remains stored up for a time, according to the Lord’s sovereign and saving purposes, it will not be so forever. What follows in verse 10 is a three-fold description of the events of the day: The release of the unstoppable, stored-up fire from the heavens to the heavenly bodies then to the earth and the works that are done in it.


Reformed Eschatology in the Writings of Geerhardus VosVos Reformed Eschatology
Ed. by Ken Gentry and Bill Boney
This is a collection of several key eschatological studies by the renowned Reformed theologian Geehardus Vos. We have modernized Vos’ grammar and syntax and updated his layout style according to modern publishing conventions (shorter sentences and paragraphs). We did this without changing any of Vos’ arguments.

For more information on this new Vos work or to order it, see:
https://www.kennethgentry.com/reformed-eschatology-in-the-writings-of-geerhardus-vos/


Elements (Stoicheia)
The Greek word translated as “heavenly bodies” is stoicheia. It is found seven times in the New Testament (Gal. 4:3, 9; Col. 2:8, 20; Heb. 5:12; 2 Pet. 3:10, 12). The following four interpretations have been proposed: (1) material elements of the universe, like earth, air, fire and water; (2) heavenly bodies, like constellations of stars; (3) fundamental principles of any science, art, or discipline; and (4) elemental spirits.

The second interpretation, “heavenly bodies,” may find support in Isaiah 34:4, “All the host of heaven shall rot away, and the skies roll up like a scroll. All their host shall fall, as leaves fall from the vine, like leaves falling from the fig tree.” Some have also pointed out that the stoicheia relate to the heavens in the same way the works relate to the earth, and so should be understood as heavenly bodies. However, the structure of 2 Peter 3:10 is not so neat. We might translate it woodenly as,

The heavens, with a rushing noise, will pass away,
The stoicheia, burning up, will be dissolved,
And earth and the works in it will be exposed.

These three clauses could be literarily arranged in at least two ways. First, it could be chiastically ordered:

      A. The heavens, with a rushing noise, will pass away,
          B. The stoicheia, burning up, will be dissolved,
      Aˈ. And earth and the works in it will be exposed.

Accordingly, the stoicheia are situated within the merism of “heaven and earth.” [1] This would make the stoicheia common to both. It would likely then be referring to the material elements of the universe.


The Truth about Postmillennialism
By Ken Gentry

A group Bible study guide for explaining the optimistic prophetic hope for this world to be accomplished before Christ’s Second Coming. Establishes the postmillennial system in both the Old and New Testaments. Touches on key eschatological issues, such as creation, covenant, interpretive methodolgy, the great tribulation, the Book of Revelation, the Jewish Temple, and more. It presents and answers the leading objections to postmillennialism.Twelve chapters are ideal for one quarter of Sunday School.

See more study materials at: www.KennethGentry.com


Second, there could be understood an intensification to the events of the day of the Lord:

     A. The heavens, with a rushing noise, will pass away,
             B. The stoicheia, burning up, will be dissolved,
                 C. And earth and the works in it will be exposed.

All the protective layers of the cosmos that man may have relied upon to shield him from the divine judgment are stripped away until what he has done is exposed and the heart of the matter exposed. Not even the mountains will serve as a safe hiding place (Hos. 10:8; Luke 23:30; Rev. 6:16). In this second ordering, the stoicheia may also refer not to the heavenly bodies but to the material elements in which man may have trusted as idols for protection. This is reflected in the mythologized thought nature of the Greek gods who were up of those elements (e.g., Poseidon as the god of water).” “They to control certain elements but were themselves made exchanged the truth about God for a lie and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator” (Rom. 1:25). Finally, the fact that fire and water, two of the material elements, have already played a dominant role in Peter’s thought in this chapter further suggests interpreting stoicheia as material elements from which idols are fashioned (see Deut. 32:21-22).


Footnote

[1] A merism is a rhetorical device in which two contrasting parts refer to the whole. [KG note: the “heavens and earth” merism is effectively a Hebrew reference to the universe, a word which Hebrew does not contain].


The Truth about Salvation By Ken Gentry

A study guide for personal or small group Bible study. Deals with the Christian doctrine of salvation from a Reformed theological perspective. It opens with a study of God as loving Creator, the shows how the first man fell into sin. Shows God’s righteousness requires that sin be dealt with. Presents Jesus as both God and man so that he can be man’s Savior. Includes review questions and questions for further study.Twelve chapters are ideal for one quarter of Sunday School.

See more study materials at: www.KennethGentry.com


WHAT WAS SODOM’S SIN?

PMW 2026-010 by Kenneth L. Gentry, Jr.

In Gen. 19:5 we read: They called to Lot and said to him, “Where are the men who came to you tonight? Bring them out to us that we may have relations with them.” What do these men intend by this request to Lot?

Historically, Jew and Christian alike have recognized Sodom’s pervasive sin (highlighted in Gen. 18–19) as widespread homosexual conduct. But in the contemporary world of collapsing moral values, many “affirming” scholars, whole liberal denominations, and an increasing number of evangelical Christians have challenged this understanding. Continue reading

POSTMILLENNIALISM’S HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT

PMW 2026-011 by J. Macleod

Gentry note:
This is a helpful article about postmillennialism by someone other than me! It is an insightful historical study by J. Macleod. I though that you deserve a break today. (McDonalds used to use this phrase in their advertising jingle when they were a fast-food restaurant. Now their service has slowed so much, I think they should consider this slogan: “Same-day Service!”)

McLeod’s article:

Eschatology is the study of the doctrine of the “last things”. Traditionally, positions have been defined by one’s views on the return of Christ — whether it will be before or after the “millennium”. The “millennium” (literally “a thousand years’) is the name given to a long period of gospel blessing promised in the Word.”Postmillennialism” is the view that the Second Coming (or the Second Advent) of Christ will take place after the millennium. Here the minister of Duthil-Dores Free Church deals with how ideas about this have developed. Next month, the Biblical basis for this point of view will be examined. Continue reading

MATT. 5:17 AND THE PASSING OF HEAVEN AND EARTH

PMW 2026-009 by Kenneth L. Gentry, Jr.

A reader has written to ask me about the implications of Matt. 5:17 for new creation theology. I thought our interaction might be helpful to PostmillennialWorldview readers.

Reader’s question

“I have a question for you that has bothered me off and on. As a partial preterist, I defend the interpretation of “New heavens and Earth” as the figurative establishment of the New Covenant and the passing away of the old heavens and earth as the passing of the Old Covenant. But as a reluctant theonomist, this puts pressure on my understanding of Matt 5:17 (Jesus saying that the Law will not pass away until the heavens and earth pass away). Because that would seem to indicate then that the binding authority of the Mosaic Law DOES pass away with the Old Covenant if we maintain a consistent interpretation of the ‘heavens and earth’ metaphor as covenants. See what I mean? How do you understand this conundrum?”

Continue reading

ESCHATOLOGY AS PROTOLOGY (4)

Stairway to heavenPMW 2026-008 by Kenneth L. Gentry, Jr.

I am returning to my analysis of the Framework Hypothesis which overthrows the long-held traditional interpretation of Gen 1 by changing the clear message of the creation narrative in Genesis 1. As noted previously, this is significant for the postmillennialist in that the postmillennial argument literally begins “In the beginning.”

In the two previous articles I quickly presented and briefly rebutted the first two arguments for the Framework view: (1) The triad of days (i.e., the framework) in Genesis 1. (2) The new interpretation of Gen 2:5 which allegedly presents God’s modus operandi in creation week (i.e., slow providence rather than instant miracle). In this article we come to the final theological argument for the Framework Hypothesis that Meredith Kline and his disciples employ: the two-register cosmogony. Continue reading

ESCHATOLOGY AS PROTOLOGY (3)

Slow growthPMW-2026-008 by Kenneth L. Gentry, Jr.

As I have been noting in this series: creation and consummation are theologically-linked in Scripture. Therefore, a proper view of creation is significant for the eschatological argument for postmillennialism. Simply put: if you do not begin right, you will not end right. Therefore, when I present a full argument for postmillennialism, I begin with creation.

Not only am I a postmillennialist, but I am also a Six-day Creationist (as if I didn’t have enough problems!), hence a non-evolutionist.In this series I am defending Six-day Creation against the Framework Hypothesis by demonstrating the Framework’s errors. This hypothesis is as a major evangelical opponent of Six-day Creation, and not surprisingly, is held mainly by amillennialists. Continue reading

ESCHATOLOGY AS PROTOLOGY (2)

Creation bookPMW 2021-001 by Kenneth L. Gentry, Jr.

In my last blog article I began presenting my  book, As It Is Written, which is on creation. Creation necessarily impacts consummation because of the linear progress of history under God’s sovereignty. Therefore the postmillennialist should be interested in creation issues. And Six-day creation is a strong foundation stone for the postmillennial hope.

A rehearsal of the Framework argument

In that last article I pointed out the three exegetical foundations to the Framework Hypothesis, a major evangelical re-interpretive approach to the Creation narrative. I will quickly repeat those here, then provide a brief rebuttal to each. My book should be consulted for a thorough response. Continue reading