SHOULD WE VOTE LESSER OF EVILS? (2)

PMW 2026-023 by Kenneth L. Gentry, Jr.

In my last article, I noted that we are in an election year in America, and that as Christians we need to consider political issues. But now I want to focus on the vitally important:

The Question of Principle

We need carefully to reflect on the question of principle itself, which I will do under several headings.

First, distinguishing our principles. When we are engaging in politics we must be careful not to place our political actions (e.g., voting) on the same level as our doctrinal commitments (i.e., faith in Scripture). We must be careful not to develop a messianic political outlook. That is, we should not believe that if we can only elect the right candidate he will save our nation.

This problem of viewing political principles as if they are on the same level as doctrinal convictions is quite widespread. For instance, consider the “Defending Contending” website cited above. Notice how the writer (“Pilgrim”) sets up the debate: “true Christians should not have to vote if they first have to sit down and estimate which candidate is the lesser of two evils.” This writer is classifying “true” Christians by their voting rather than by their doctrinal commitments and personal lifestyle. This type of thinking apparently believes that “by their votes you shall know them.”

Continue reading

SHOULD WE VOTE LESSER OF EVILS? (1)

PMW 2026-022 by Kenneth L. Gentry, Jr.

As we move closer to our important off-year elections, American Christians need to think carefully about the options before us. As postmillennialists we recognize that we are in a socio-political struggle. For the long run. Therefore, we must act accordingly. Like it or not, in politics we cannot expect overnight success through one particular election or by means of a “perfect” candidate. To continually vote for the “perfect” candidate when we know he is going to lose does not help us build for the future, for by that we are ceding more victories to the overt liberals. Liberalism is a mess. And when its goo gets all over the place, it is very difficult to clean up the mess.

Continue reading

BAD REASONS FOR AVOIDING POLITICS

PMW 2026-021 by Kenneth L. Gentry, Jr.

This is an election year for America. And Christians need to think about our political circumstances and duties. After all Christians should be committed to a holistic Christian worldview. And by the very nature of the case, a worldview must involve the “world.” And since politics is a large function in human society, you would think all Christians would recognize the importance of a Christian involvement in politics. But you would be wrong.

Many Christians discourage engagement in politics. In fact, they often attempt to use the Scripture to dissuade Christians from political endeavors and concerns. Others simply avoid political issues for one reason or another. Some of the leading complaints against a concern with or an involvement in politics are the following:

Continue reading

TEN THINGS POSTMILLENNIALISTS BELIEVE

PMW 2026-020 by Greg L. Bahnsen

Gentry note: This article is clipped from Greg L. Bahnsen’s postmillennial work Victory in Jesus. It is a helpful summary of some of the key features of the postmillennial hope. Dr. Bahnsen was an American Calvinist philosopher and Christian apologist. He was a minister in the Orthodox Presbyterian Church and a full-time Scholar in Residence for the Southern California Center for Christian Studies (SCCCS). He is also considered a leading contributor to the field of Christian apologetics, as he popularized the presuppositional method of Cornelius Van Til.

The following is from pp. 40–44 of his book:

1. As postmillennialists we champion the inspiration, infallibility and we read the newspaper — this should be obvious. When we read the newspapers how could we possibly have this kind of hope? We do not have it be cause the world is going so well.

Continue reading

ROBERT LETHAM ON POSTMILLENNIALISM

PMW 2026-019 by Robert Letham

Gentry note:

Robert Letham is Professor of Systematic and Historical Theology at the Union School of Theology. He is also Adjunct Professor of Systematic Theology at Westminster Theological Seminary. He is a Reformed, conservative, orthodox postmillennial preterist (he has strong words condemning hyper-preterism as heresy, p. 848). This blog article quotes material from Letham’s excellent Systematic Theology, pp. 835–838. I highly recommend this fine work.

Now for Letham’s argument:

The Church and the Progress of the Gospel

Paul on events preceding the parousia (2 Thess. 2:1ff.). Paul warns his readers against letters claiming that the day of the Lord, the parousia, is at hand. Some in the church, thinking Christ was about to return, had stopped working in order to prepare for his appearance (2 Thess. 2:1ff.; 3:6ff.). This, Paul says, is unacceptable behavior based on an untenable hypothesis.

Continue reading

HODGE ON ROMANS 11

PMW 2026-018 by Charles Hodge

Romans 11:25–26 is a passage that is helpful for supporting the postmillennial hope. Perhaps the best exposition is that by John Murray in his commentary on Romans. In this article, however, I will post Charles Hodge’s view, which comports well with Murray’s.

I will alter Hodge’s passages in only four minor ways: (1) I will break up his statements in a more modern style, making it more easily accessible. I will, however, maintain Hodge’s words as they appear in the text. (2) I will transliterate his Greek into English. (3) I will change his punctuation to a more modern style. For example, he sometimes puts commas and semi-colons within a parenthesis, whereas today they are properly placed outside of it. (4) I will replace Roman numerals with Arabic numerals. I do this because there are II kinds of people in the world: those who understand Roman numerals and those who don’t. I want to minister to all people by this change!

Let’s get started with Hodge’s argument. All that follows is Hodge’s own presentation. Continue reading

OUR PERFECT SAVIOR

PMW 2026:017 by Kenneth L. Gentry, Jr.

We are called “Christians” (Acts 11:26) and are committed to the “Christian” faith (Acts 26:28; 1 Pet 4:16). Consequently, Christ is central to our doctrine and practice. Indeed, he is not only central to Christianity, he is absolutely essential to it. And as such he is fundamental to explaining The Truth about Salvation.

As we begin a two-chapter study of Christ as Savior we must first recognize that:

MAN NEEDS A PERFECT SAVIOR

As we saw in earlier chapters, man is wholly corrupted by sin. As Isaiah poetically pictures Israel’s condition, so may we characterize mankind’s condition before God: “the whole head is sick / And the whole heart is faint / From the sole of the foot even to the head / There is nothing sound in it, / Only bruises, welts and raw wounds” (Isa 1:5–6).

Indeed, David observes that “in Your sight no man living is righteous” (Psa 143:2). He states this because “there is no man who does not sin” (1 Kgs 8:46; cp. Eccl 7:20; Rom 3:10, 20). Yet as an immortal creature made in God’s image (Gen 1:26), he desperately needs salvation. He must have his positive relationship with his Creator restored, for as we read in Ecclesiastes: “God made men upright, but they have sought out many devices” (Eccl 7:29).

Continue reading