REDEMPTIVE GRACE

PMW 2026:015 by Kenneth L. Gentry, Jr.

The word “grace” in the Bible is not always used as a redemptive term. In fact, neither does it always bear the same basic meaning (e.g., it can mean attractive, gift, or thanks).

THE FACT OF REDEMPTIVE GRACE

Nevertheless, the most important idea involved in grace in its most widely used meaning speaks of an active favor or good will extended from one person to another, whether from God to man (Gen 6:8; Exo 34:9) or from man to man (Gen 33:15; 1 Sam 1:18). Fundamental to this meaning of grace is that it involves a benefit that is freely given in kindness to another who has no claim on the giver.

We find a general use of the term “grace” that clearly exhibits this significance in Lot’s experience. Genesis uses the Hebrew for “grace” in Lot’s response to one of the angels who come to escort him to safety before God destroys Sodom (Gen 19:15–17). In Genesis 19:19 we read of Lot’s thankful recognition of the angel’s display of grace: “Now behold, your servant has found favor in your sight, and you have magnified your lovingkindness, which you have shown me by saving my life.”

But the grace in which we are interested is the grace of God in salvation. The general idea of grace is gloriously magnified in his specific saving mercy in behalf of the sinner.

God’s redemptive grace is his unmerited work in behalf of sinners, by which they receive the benefit of forgiveness of sin and eternal salvation from God’s judgment.


1 John: Salvation, Heresy, Assurance
20 downloadable mp3 sermons by Ken Gentry
First John is a much neglected epistle that deals with crucial issues: it explains salvation, warns against heresy, and demonstrates the assurance of salvation. Very helpful, especially for new Christians.
See more study materials at: www.KennethGentry.com


Indeed, as theologian Louis Berkhof explains: “grace is an attribute of God, one of the divine perfections. It is God’s free, sovereign, undeserved favour or love to man, in his state of sin and guilt, which manifests itself in the forgiveness of sin and deliverance from its penalty.”

Because of man’s sin (see ch 2) he deserves God’s wrath, yet because of God’s grace he receives God’s blessing. As Peter expresses it to his audience: God saves man from his sin because he is “the God of all grace, who has called you to His eternal glory in Christ” (1 Pet 5:10). In salvation Christ, the Son of God, stands in for the sinner and endures God’s righteous judgment upon sin, so that the sinner himself may be saved. This is why God turns his face from Christ as he suffers on the cross (Matt 27:46).

For instance, in 2 Corinthians 5:21 we read that God “made Him who knew no sin to be sin on our behalf, so that we might become the righteousness of God in Him.” Paul teaches us that Christ “was delivered over because of our transgressions” (Rom 4:25; cp. Rom 8:32; Gal 2:20; Eph 5:2). Indeed, he states that “Christ redeemed us from the curse of the Law, having become a curse for us” (Gal 3:13).

But there is more.

God’s saving grace is not only granted to the undeserving but to the ill-deserving. That is, we should not illustrate God’s grace in salvation as being like someone giving a gift to a homeless person, i.e., the undeserving. Rather it is better to picture it as someone giving a gift to a homeless person after the homeless person has viciously attacked him, i.e., to the ill-deserving. Grace is undeserved favor for the ill-deserving sinner.

So then, as we should understand from our earlier study of sin, we are sinners who deserve the opposite of God’s favor: we deserve his wrath. For “God demonstrates His own love toward us, in that while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us” (Rom 5:8). Indeed, Christ “died for the ungodly” (Rom 5:6). Because of its theological usage, the English word “grace” has served as a useful acronym for God’s saving love for sinners: God’s Riches At Christ’s Expense.

As a consequence of God’s saving grace, Paul can write that “having been justified by faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ, through whom also we have obtained our introduction by faith into this grace in which we stand; and we exult in hope of the glory of God” (Rom 5:1–2). Thus, simply put, the “gospel” (literally: “good news”) is “the gospel of the grace of God” (Acts 20:24). We truly “receive the abundance of grace and of the gift of righteousness . . . through the One, Jesus Christ” (Rom 5:17).


Christ’s Church (20 mp3 downloads)
by Ken Gentry
An in-depth sermonic presentation of the doctrine of the church. This is vitally important today with the evangelical church not living up to its biblical calling
See more study materials at: www.KennethGentry.com


But now let us consider:

THE BEGINNING OF REDEMPTIVE GRACE

To better understand the glory of God as a gracious Redeemer, we must once again look back to the beginning. For immediately upon Adam’s fall into sin (bringing corruption into man’s being and ruin into his history), God promises redemption. Thus, God dramatically exhibits his grace by exercising it in the very historical context of man’s rebellion.

Even as God calls down his curse upon Satan, Adam, and Eve, he promises a coming Redeemer for man. In Genesis 3:15 we read God’s curse upon Satan which simultaneously presents his blessing upon man: “I will put enmity Between you and the woman, / And between your seed and her seed; / He shall bruise you on the head, / And you shall bruise him on the heel.” In these words we may discern several important truths.

First, we see that because of his sin and the enmity of Satan, man must expect conflict in history. This brief prophecy presents us with a mighty, history-long struggle between the serpent’s seed and the woman’s seed. The tranquility in Eden has been breached and the turbulence in history has begun. We see the immediate results of this conflict in Eve’s firstborn son, Cain, killing her second son, Abel (Gen 4:1–8). This murderous hostility continues as we see in Lamech (Gen 4:23–24), in Noah’s day (Gen 6:5), and throughout Scripture. It becomes so bad that God says “I will blot out man whom I have created . . , for I am sorry that I have made them” (Gen 6:7).

But, second, we see that God presents two seed lines that will engage the struggle in history. The word for “seed” here “can refer to an immediate descendant (Gen. 4:25; 15:3), a distant offspring [Gal 3:16, 19], or a rather large group of descendants [Gen 22:17; Psa 105:6]. Here and throughout Scripture, all three senses are developed and merged in tracing this concept. In our Genesis text we can infer both the single and collective senses.”


God Gave Wine (by Ken Gentry)

A biblical defense of moderate alcohol consumption. Considers all key biblical passages and engages the leading objections.

See more study materials at: www.KennethGentry.com


The two seed lines which are traced throughout Scripture are the seed of the serpent and the seed of the woman. The seed of the serpent is not a literal lineage, but a spiritual line of people who follow Satan’s original rebellion against God: this line includes all the non-elect (Matt 13:38; John 8:44). The seed of the woman involves both a literal singular seed (Christ) and a spiritual corporate seed which follows God’s original intention for Eve: they are the elect (John 1:12; 11:52; 1 John 3:1–2).

After Cain slays Abel we read of the birth of Seth’s son, Enosh. There we discover that “then men began to call upon the name of the LORD” (Gen 4:26). John presents these antithetical seed lines as “the children of God and the children of the devil” (1 John 3:8, cp. Matt 13:48; John 8:44; 1 John 3:10).

The ultimate individual, literal seed of the woman is Jesus Christ, the Redeemer of God’s elect. “When the fullness of the time came, God sent forth His Son, born of a woman, born under the Law, so that He might redeem those who were under the Law, that we might receive the adoption as sons “ (Gal 4:4–5). Luke traces Jesus’ genealogy from Mary back to “the son of Enosh, the son of Seth, the son of Adam, the son of God” (Luke 3:38).

Third, the seed of the woman (Christ) will conquer the seed of the serpent (Satan). Though Satan will bruise his heel (a painful wound), Christ will crush his head (a mortal blow). Despite Satan’s attempt to corrupt mankind and destroy God’s work, God here promises to send a Redeemer who will conquer him by means of his redemptive grace. God’s seed will secure victory in history.

Thus, the prophecy in Genesis 3:15 is theologically called the “protoevangelium,” the first promise (“proto”) of the gospel (“evangelium”) and its victory in history. In fact, it is the first prophecy in Scripture and it points to the coming of our Redeemer, Jesus Christ the Son of God in whom he is well-pleased (Matt 3:16; 17:5). God is indeed a gracious Redeemer.


God's Law Made Easy 2019

God’s Law Made Easy

(by Kenneth Gentry)

Summary for the case for the continuing relevance of God’s Law. A helpful summary of the argument from Greg L. Bahnsen’s Theonomy in Christian Ethics.

See more study materials at: www.KennethGentry.com


POSTMILLENNIALISM IN CREATION & FALL (2)

PMW 2026:014 by Kenneth L. Gentry, Jr.

This the second article in my study of postmillennialism in creation and fall. In my previous article I pointed out the significance of the sabbath principle that promises us divinely-ordained, glorious rest. But now we must look at exactly how this ultimate consummate rest impacts our understanding of postmillennial progress. This lead us to:

THE GRADUALISM PRINCIPLE

As I have shown, creation has a glorious goal: our ultimate rest will occur at the end of history. Yet we must see that it begins to transpire within history as God providentially moves history toward his ordained goal of rest. So as we consider how the postmillennial hope is impacted by this, we must understand how God created world.

Continue reading

POSTMILLENNIALISM IN CREATION & FALL (1)

PMW 2026:013 by Kenneth L. Gentry, Jr.

As postmillennialists, we should have a strong interest in the creation account in Genesis 1–2. The sovereign God who created all things in the space of six days is the sovereign God who will lead his kingdom to victory in history.

Not only so, but we should note the important linkage of the creation account to the immediately following fall and redemption account in Genesis 3. When these two theologically foundational accounts are read together, we begin seeing very early in Scripture a clear anticipation of the postmillennial hope. Let me explain. Continue reading

IMPORTANCE OF THE PHYSICAL REALM

PMW-2026-012 by Brandon D. Crowe

Introduction
Professor Brandon Crowe of Westminster Theological Seminary has presented us with a compelling message regarding the centrality of the physical resurrection of Christ to Christianity. He focuses particularly on the resurrection in Acts. Despite the neo-Gnosticism arising from within the aberrant hyper-preterist movement, the physical realm is important — now and forever. I highly recommend reading this important work. Consider the following quote from the conclusion of Crowe’s The Hope of Israel: The Resurrection of Christ in the Acts of the Apostles (pp. 189–90). The headings are mine (KLG).

The physical resurrection
As we conclude, I would like to consider briefly some ways that the physical of Jesus underscores the distinctiveness of the early Christian message. Acts itself is a witness to the centrality of belief in the physical resurrection in early Christianity, and we find evidence for this belief in the New Testament canon. Theologian Herman Bavinck put it well: “From the beginning the resurrection of Christ was an enormously important constituent of the faith of the church: without that faith it would never have started.” Indeed, in many ways the bodily resurrection encapsulates the distinctiveness the Christian message in the ancient world and manifests a key point of unity among early orthodox Christians. The vine of early Christianity rose on the trellis of shared theological convictions; the physical resurrection was one of those key convictions. Several implications are entailed in this doctrine. Continue reading

NEW CREATION IN 2 PETER

PMW 2026-011 by Daniel J. Ragusa

Gentry note:
This posting is an excerpt drawn from an excellent commentary on 2 Peter by Daniel J. Ragusa, Exploring 2 Peter: The Promise and the Path. To read his whole exposition, complete with footnotes omitted here (except for one note explaining what a “merism” is), you may purchase it as at: Reformed Forum.
https://reformedforum.org/product/exploring-2-peter-the-promise-and-the-path-redemptive-historical-bible-studies/

Now for Ragusa’s explanation of 2 Peter 3 and “the Day of the Lord” (pp. 113–118):

The Day of the Lord
Peter … describes what the day of the Lord will be like in [2 Peter] verse 10: “But the day of the Lord will come like a thief, and then the heavens will pass away with a roar, and the heavenly bodies [or elements, Gk. stoicheial will be burned up and dissolved, and the earth and the works that are done on it will be exposed.” We have already considered the Old Testament background to the day of the Lord as a day of finality and double features — punishment and deliverance, judgment and salvation. It “will come like a thief” in keeping with the sovereignty of the Lord of the promise over its fulfillment.

The thief image highlights the inevitability and suddenness of its dawn for the ungodly. According to verse 7, “the heavens and earth that now exist are stored up for fire, being kept until the day of judgment and the destruction of the ungodly.” While it remains stored up for a time, according to the Lord’s sovereign and saving purposes, it will not be so forever. What follows in verse 10 is a three-fold description of the events of the day: The release of the unstoppable, stored-up fire from the heavens to the heavenly bodies then to the earth and the works that are done in it.


Reformed Eschatology in the Writings of Geerhardus VosVos Reformed Eschatology
Ed. by Ken Gentry and Bill Boney
This is a collection of several key eschatological studies by the renowned Reformed theologian Geehardus Vos. We have modernized Vos’ grammar and syntax and updated his layout style according to modern publishing conventions (shorter sentences and paragraphs). We did this without changing any of Vos’ arguments.

For more information on this new Vos work or to order it, see:
https://www.kennethgentry.com/reformed-eschatology-in-the-writings-of-geerhardus-vos/


Elements (Stoicheia)
The Greek word translated as “heavenly bodies” is stoicheia. It is found seven times in the New Testament (Gal. 4:3, 9; Col. 2:8, 20; Heb. 5:12; 2 Pet. 3:10, 12). The following four interpretations have been proposed: (1) material elements of the universe, like earth, air, fire and water; (2) heavenly bodies, like constellations of stars; (3) fundamental principles of any science, art, or discipline; and (4) elemental spirits.

The second interpretation, “heavenly bodies,” may find support in Isaiah 34:4, “All the host of heaven shall rot away, and the skies roll up like a scroll. All their host shall fall, as leaves fall from the vine, like leaves falling from the fig tree.” Some have also pointed out that the stoicheia relate to the heavens in the same way the works relate to the earth, and so should be understood as heavenly bodies. However, the structure of 2 Peter 3:10 is not so neat. We might translate it woodenly as,

The heavens, with a rushing noise, will pass away,
The stoicheia, burning up, will be dissolved,
And earth and the works in it will be exposed.

These three clauses could be literarily arranged in at least two ways. First, it could be chiastically ordered:

      A. The heavens, with a rushing noise, will pass away,
          B. The stoicheia, burning up, will be dissolved,
      Aˈ. And earth and the works in it will be exposed.

Accordingly, the stoicheia are situated within the merism of “heaven and earth.” [1] This would make the stoicheia common to both. It would likely then be referring to the material elements of the universe.


The Truth about Postmillennialism
By Ken Gentry

A group Bible study guide for explaining the optimistic prophetic hope for this world to be accomplished before Christ’s Second Coming. Establishes the postmillennial system in both the Old and New Testaments. Touches on key eschatological issues, such as creation, covenant, interpretive methodolgy, the great tribulation, the Book of Revelation, the Jewish Temple, and more. It presents and answers the leading objections to postmillennialism.Twelve chapters are ideal for one quarter of Sunday School.

See more study materials at: www.KennethGentry.com


Second, there could be understood an intensification to the events of the day of the Lord:

     A. The heavens, with a rushing noise, will pass away,
             B. The stoicheia, burning up, will be dissolved,
                 C. And earth and the works in it will be exposed.

All the protective layers of the cosmos that man may have relied upon to shield him from the divine judgment are stripped away until what he has done is exposed and the heart of the matter exposed. Not even the mountains will serve as a safe hiding place (Hos. 10:8; Luke 23:30; Rev. 6:16). In this second ordering, the stoicheia may also refer not to the heavenly bodies but to the material elements in which man may have trusted as idols for protection. This is reflected in the mythologized thought nature of the Greek gods who were up of those elements (e.g., Poseidon as the god of water).” “They to control certain elements but were themselves made exchanged the truth about God for a lie and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator” (Rom. 1:25). Finally, the fact that fire and water, two of the material elements, have already played a dominant role in Peter’s thought in this chapter further suggests interpreting stoicheia as material elements from which idols are fashioned (see Deut. 32:21-22).


Footnote

[1] A merism is a rhetorical device in which two contrasting parts refer to the whole. [KG note: the “heavens and earth” merism is effectively a Hebrew reference to the universe, a word which Hebrew does not contain].


The Truth about Salvation By Ken Gentry

A study guide for personal or small group Bible study. Deals with the Christian doctrine of salvation from a Reformed theological perspective. It opens with a study of God as loving Creator, the shows how the first man fell into sin. Shows God’s righteousness requires that sin be dealt with. Presents Jesus as both God and man so that he can be man’s Savior. Includes review questions and questions for further study.Twelve chapters are ideal for one quarter of Sunday School.

See more study materials at: www.KennethGentry.com


WHAT WAS SODOM’S SIN?

PMW 2026-010 by Kenneth L. Gentry, Jr.

In Gen. 19:5 we read: They called to Lot and said to him, “Where are the men who came to you tonight? Bring them out to us that we may have relations with them.” What do these men intend by this request to Lot?

Historically, Jew and Christian alike have recognized Sodom’s pervasive sin (highlighted in Gen. 18–19) as widespread homosexual conduct. But in the contemporary world of collapsing moral values, many “affirming” scholars, whole liberal denominations, and an increasing number of evangelical Christians have challenged this understanding. Continue reading

POSTMILLENNIALISM’S HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT

PMW 2026-011 by J. Macleod

Gentry note:
This is a helpful article about postmillennialism by someone other than me! It is an insightful historical study by J. Macleod. I though that you deserve a break today. (McDonalds used to use this phrase in their advertising jingle when they were a fast-food restaurant. Now their service has slowed so much, I think they should consider this slogan: “Same-day Service!”)

McLeod’s article:

Eschatology is the study of the doctrine of the “last things”. Traditionally, positions have been defined by one’s views on the return of Christ — whether it will be before or after the “millennium”. The “millennium” (literally “a thousand years’) is the name given to a long period of gospel blessing promised in the Word.”Postmillennialism” is the view that the Second Coming (or the Second Advent) of Christ will take place after the millennium. Here the minister of Duthil-Dores Free Church deals with how ideas about this have developed. Next month, the Biblical basis for this point of view will be examined. Continue reading