PMW 2022-089 by Philosophical Investigations
Resurrection Is Central to Christianity
The resurrection of Christ is a vital foundation for the faith. Paul writes to the Corinthian church:
“If Christ has not been raised, our preaching is useless and so is your faith. More than that, we are then found to be false witnesses about God, for we have testified about God that he raised Christ from the dead. But he did not raise him if in fact the dead are not raised. For if the dead are not raised, then Christ has not been raised either. And if Christ has not been raised, your faith is futile; you are still in your sins. Then those also who have fallen asleep in Christ are lost. If only for this life we have hope in Christ, we are of all people most to be pitied” (1 Cor 15:14-19).
However, Paul is equally definite about the importance of the resurrection of believers too: “If there is no resurrection of the dead, then not even Christ has been raised” (1 Cor 15:13). He goes on to affirm: “Listen, I tell you a mystery: we will not all sleep, but we will all be changed –in a flash, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trumpet. For the trumpet will sound, the dead will be raised imperishable, and we will be changed” (1 Cor 15:51-52).
In the Apostles Creed we confidently affirm: “I believe in the resurrection of the body.” But what do we mean? Does it mean our present body is raised or is it a totally new body? Is it a physical body? What does Paul mean when he refers to the resurrection body as a “spiritual body”? He writes about the body at death: “it is sown a natural body, it is raised a spiritual body. If there is a natural body, there is also a spiritual body” (1 Cor 15:44).
What Does Paul Mean by a Spiritual Body?
Does he mean it is no longer a physical body?
Physical objects and people in this life can be described as “spiritual.” Elsewhere in 1 Corinthians Paul uses the word ‘spiritual’ to describe people or objects which are clearly physical.
The literal translation of what Paul writes in Greek in 1 Cor 2:14–15 is: “… a natural man does not receive the things of the Spirit of God for they are foolishness to him, and he is not able to know them because they are spiritually discerned. But the spiritual one discerns all things.” (The NIV translates “spiritual one” as “the person with the Spirit” which is not literal but shows Paul is speaking of human beings in this life, i.e. physical human beings. Yet he calls them spiritual).
Why I Left Full-Preterism (by Samuel M. Frost)
Former leader in Full Preterist movement, Samuel M. Frost, gives his testimony and theological reasoning as to why he left the heretical movement. Good warning to others tempted to leave orthodox Christianity.
See more study materials at: KennethGentry.com
Similarly in 1 Cor 10:3–4 Paul speaks of the manna eaten by Israel in the wilderness and the water Moses brought forth from the rock as “spiritual food” and “spiritual drink.” Yet it was, of course, physical.
We ourselves may refer to someone as a spiritual person, but we don’t mean they are not physical. Professor Andrew Lincoln writes: “By the term spiritual we must not understand this to mean non-material or non-physical, but that it is a way of describing a bodily existence that is fully energised by the Spirit.”
Our Resurrection Body Like Jesus’ Resurrection Body
Paul says that Jesus “will transform our lowly bodies so that they will be like his glorious body” (Philippians 3:21). Jesus resurrection body was spiritual but it was also physical:
The risen Jesus could be touched: “They came to him, clasped his feet and worshipped him” (Matt 28:9). Jesus said to Thomas “Put your finger here; see my hands. Reach out your hand and put it into my side” (John 20:27). Similarly he said: “Look at my hands and my feet. It is I myself! Touch me and see; a ghost does not have flesh and bones, as you see I have” (Luke 24:39).
The risen Jesus ate with the disciples: “They gave him a piece of broiled fish, and he took it and ate it in their presence” (Luke 24:42–43).
The risen Jesus broke bread and gave it to his disciples: “When he was at the table with them, he took bread, gave thanks, broke it and began to give it to them” (Luke 24:30).
The risen Jesus made a fire and cooked fish for breakfast for the disciples: “When they landed, they saw a fire of burning coals there with fish on it, and some bread …. Jesus said to them, ‘Come and have breakfast.’ None of the disciples dared ask him, ‘Who are you?’ They knew it was the Lord. Jesus came, took the bread and gave it to them, and did the same with the fish” (John 21:9, 12–13).
Why Not Full-Preterism? by Steve Gregg
This work exposes some of the key flaws in Hyperpreterism by someone who has formally debated them. Much insightful material for those who might be tempted to forsake historic Christian orthodoxy.
For more Christian educational materials: www.KennethGentry.com
Our Resurrection Body a Glorified Body
Paul says that our resurrection bodies will be imperishable, glorious and powerful: “The body that is sown is perishable, it is raised imperishable; it is sown in dishonour, it is raised in glory; it is sown in weakness, it is raised in power” (1 Cor 15:42–43).
Our bodies will be imperishable and powerful. They will not experience tiredness, weakness, sickness, injury, ageing or death.
Our bodies will be glorious. Professor Wayne Grudem makes an interesting comment: “Because the word `glory’ is so frequently used in Scripture of the bright shining radiance that surrounds the presence of God himself, this term suggests that there will also be a kind of brightness or radiance surrounding our bodies that will be an appropriate outward evidence of the position of exaltation and rule over all creation that God has given us. This is also suggested in Matthew 13:43, where Jesus says, ‘Then the righteous will shine like the sun in the kingdom of their Father.’ Similarly, we read in Daniel’s vision, ‘And those who are wise shall shine like the brightness of the firmament; and those who turn many to righteousness, like the stars forever and ever’ (Daniel 12:3).”
The risen Jesus was able to appear and disappear and to move through solid objects: “On the evening of that first day of the week, when the disciples were together, with the doors locked for fear of the Jewish leaders, Jesus came and stood among them and said, ‘Peace be with you!’ After he said this, he showed them his hands and side. The disciples were overjoyed when they saw the Lord …. A week later his disciples were in the house again, and Thomas was with them. Though the doors were locked, Jesus came and stood among them and said, ‘Peace be with you!’” (John 20:19-20, 26). There is some debate over whether this will be true of our resurrection bodies. Some say it was something unique Jesus did but I see no reason why it should not be an ability of our risen bodies.
However it is not helpful to pursue further speculation. St Thomas Aquinas does in his Summa Theologica. He considers questions about whether our hair and nails will grow etc!
What about “flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God”?
Some have thought this means that the resurrection body cannot be physical. But that is to misunderstand the term “flesh and blood.” Professor N T Wright says: “Ever since the second century doubters have used this clause to question whether Paul really believed in the resurrection of the body. In fact, the second half of verse 50 [“nor does the perishable inherit the imperishable”] already explains, in Hebraic parallelism with the first half [“flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God”], more or less what he means, as Paul’s regular use of ‘flesh’ would indicate: ‘flesh and blood’ is a way of referring to ordinary, corruptible, decaying human existence. It does not simply mean, as it has so often been taken to mean, ‘physical humanity’ in the normal modern sense, but ‘the present physical humanity (as opposed to the future), which is subject to decay and death.’” Other scholars agree.
In other words, our present body in its ageing and decaying state, cannot, as it is, inherit the kingdom of God, it has to be glorified by resurrection. But it remains a physical body in its glorified state.
Is our resurrection body continuous with our present body? . . .
To continue reading the full article and to see the footnotes, go to: https://peped.org/philosophicalinvestigations/article-resurrection-body/
Interesting article. I read the complete one by Higton, and I must say that in the last part, there are several items in which we disagree, but that’s to be expected as one would be hard-pressed to find two people who see eye to eye on all aspects of this subject.
But on the matter at hand, in making the case that our resurrected body will be like Jesus’ resurrected body, I offer this: After Jesus argued with the Pharisees, he cried out, saying, “’f anyone is thirsty, let him come to Me and drink. He who believes in me, as the Scripture said, ‘From his innermost being will flow rivers of living water.’ But this He spoke of the Spirit whom those who believed in Him were to receive; for the Spirit had not yet been given BECAUSE JESUS WAS NOT YET GLORIFIED” (John 7:37-39).
Jesus said about Himself glorified elsewhere (John 8:54; 11:4; 12:16, 23, 28; 13:31-32; 14:13; 15:8; 16:14; 17:1, 4-5, 10), and all the English renderings appear as though He was not yet glorified. When He appeared to Mary Magdalene after His resurrection (before Pentecost), He told her to stop clinging to Him BECAUSE HE HAD NOT YET ASCENDED TO THE FATHER. After Pentecost (Acts 3:13), and (obviously) after His ascension, Peter spoke of Christ glorified in the past tense.
So here are my observations: (1) Jesus’ post-resurrection, but pre-ascension body was not His final glorified body. Thus (2), the post-resurrection Jesus we see in the article inviting Thomas to insert his finger in His side and who ate and drank with the disciples is not the glorified Christ. Therefore (3), I don’t believe one can imply those physical traits to our final glorified post-resurrection bodies.
He was glorified upon his resurrection, which explains why he could appear and disappear at will having full eschatological control of his physically-resurrected body. And his resurrected body was made up of (glorified) “flesh and bones” (Luke 24:39). Thus, he is the firstfruit and earnest of our resurrection, which will be bodily though glorified.
What are those glorified flesh and bones going to be used for?
(1) They continue his full incarnational humanity in heaven, and (2) will be useful in the consummate new earth to be established at the last day and the final judgment when he returns.
Ok. I thought that WE ARE the NEW CREATION.
We are. But we are not the fullness of the new creation, like we are resurrected but not in resurrection fullness.
Last question and I will quit on this topic. 😀
When Jesus is having the Conversation with the Sadducees regarding the seven brothers who died in succession and redeemed the wife at each death asking “whose wife will she be in Heaven” why didn’t they ask “whose wife will she be in the New Earth” if that is our ultimate destination? Why would they be worried about a temporal state rather than the eternal one?
If the New Heaven and New Earth are literal then why are there two of them? One prior (Isaiah 65) to the 1000 years and one after (Revelation 21)?
My explanation is that Christ bought justification on the cross, etc., before the 1000 years and it resulted in that millennium. The millennium is a test of faith resulting in sanctification, and the destruction of the last of the wicked results in the glorification of saints because evil is permanently separated! Christ was granted the kingdom even though it still needed to be conquered. In conquering the Kingdom the righteous are refined and the wicked are destroyed, and NO MORE SIN=NEW CREATION, NOT A NEW COSMOS. God created man in seven days not because He is slow, but because it illustrates US becoming a new creation. It doesn’t take a PhD, Doctor Gentry, because we have the spirit to discern it for us.
The Sadducees were challenging what they thought was Jesus’ view.
Angels could take on bodily form and eat, drink and interact with mankind and they don’t have and never will have a physical body as far as we can tell from scripture. So a spiritual body is not a physical body that begins disobeying the laws of physics. It is a supernatural body that can take bodily form if and when necessary. The old body is not renewed, it is a whole new one! It is forever dead and paying the physical penalty of what it deserved. If Christ had saved us from that death then the cross would have ended physical death immediately. The new body is a resurrection of our soul from death and is a supernatural body just like the angels had and just like Christ had. I have no doubt that it could adopt superphysicality if necessary but I think once ALL natural men are in Hell, there is no need to have a dying body that never dies, which is what an immortal physical body implies. Physicality, as we know it, is a result of sin, not creation. It IS GOING FROM THE SUSTENANCE OF THE GARDEN, to the consequences of sin, which is death!
You are quite mistaken, as 2000 years of Christian doctrine shows. In Scripture we learn that man was created as a body-soul complex (Gen. 2:7). Jesus came to save us as a body-soul complex (Heb. 2:14). Jesus’ human body was buried, then resurrected with “flesh and bones” (Luke 24:39). His is the firstfruits of ours (1 Cor. 15:20), which means his was the first of the eschatological resurrection at the end of history that was to be like his. The spiritual-body is the Spirit-dominated body (incorruptible and no longer subject to hunger and death) as over against the animal-appetite dominated body (corruptible and subject to hunger and death). The “spiritual man” is not a man made out of spirit but the man led by the Spirit.
Dr. Gentry, was Adam a spiritual (spirit-controlled) human before the Fall? Does the resurrection put redeemed persons at a level that is beyond what Adam was in his pre-fall state or is that an apples and oranges comparison?
Adam was on probation, though not subject to suffering and death. Had he passed probation he would have been granted access to the tree of life and made a transformation to a higher status, which those in Christ will receive at the future bodily resurrection.
Would you agree that the doctrine of bodily resurrection is tied to the doctrine of bodily death incurred from Eden?
Second, what in your opinion does mot-ta-mut in Gen 2:17 mean? Is it ever used elsewhere.?
This phrase is a strengthened form of the declaration “you shall die.” It could be translated “dying you shall die,” which is a strengthened form of expression that highlights the certainty of death. Before Adam ate of the tree, he was not in the process of dying, though death was a prospect if he did not pass the test. Had he passed his probation he would have been able to partake of the tree of life and live forever. This would apparently have been through God’s blessing in transforming his body from its natural state of weakness to a permanent state of strength and glory. At the moment Adam partook of the tree and sinned, he was (1) separated from God (in a state of judicial death), (2) died spiritually within (spiritual death), and (3) was set on the road to eventual physical death through the processes of weakness that we now know and endure.