PROPER COMMUNION (4)

Communion 4PMW 2024-084 by Kenneth L. Gentry, Jr.

In my previous article on fencing the table I laid the foundations for considering the question before us. I introduced the idea of sacramental foundations their implications for fencing the table. Then I focused on the relationship of the sacraments to church government. Now we are finally ready to deal with the specific matter of partaking Communion.

SACRAMENTAL PARTAKING

Now I will draw out some biblical principles and directives regarding the careful fencing and partaking of the Lord’s Table.

First, the Lord’s Supper is intrinsically corporate

Although personal responsibilities fall upon the individual partakers of the Lord’s Supper (see next point below), we see clear and fundamental community overtones in it. Note the following:

(1) As I begin with these observations, we must remember that the first Lord’s Supper was established in the context of the Passover and took the place of a communal meal. Communion was designed to take the Passover’s place within the new Israel of God, the Church of Jesus Christ. This fact provides helpful background insights into the corporate setting and obligations of the sacrament. Continue reading

PROPER COMMUNION (3)

Communion 3PMW 2024-083 by Kenneth L. Gentry, Jr.

This is the third in a five-part series. The reader should read the first two articles to understand what I am getting at in this one. So, in this one, let us consider:

COMMUNION AND CHURCH GOVERNMENT

Several questions arise as we consider this issue:

• To whom was the Lord’s Supper originally given?
• In what context may it be offered?
• Who may administer it?

Answering these inter-related questions will take us a long way toward demonstrating the third and fourth elements in our fencing statement. Those elements require that a participant be a member in good standing (i.e., not under discipline) of an evangelical church and that they must have been formally admitted to the Lord’s Table by ordained church officers from an evangelical church (they may not be baptized infants who have not given a credible profession of faith, nor may baptized children approach the Table solely on their own decision without being formally approved by church officers). Let us see how this is so. Continue reading

PROPER COMMUNION (2)

Communion 2PMW 2024-082 by Kenneth L. Gentry, Jr.

In my previous posting, I introduced a new, five-part series on the proper administration of the Lord’s Supper. This article continues the study (which requires your reading the first article for a proper orientation). I am offering this study series due to my concern that the church in America has become too palsy-walsy and superficial. And I believe this is especially dangerous in regard to the sacrament of communion, which is a holy ordinance that distinguishes Christians from the world. So let us continue.

GENERAL ARGUMENT FOR FENCING

As we engage our inquiry into the biblical warrant for fencing the Table, we must begin with an irrefutable observation: the New Testament provides strong evidence that some form of fencing is required in inviting people to partake of the Lord’s Supper. Once this is recognized we have laid the essential, basic, foundational cornerstone for fencing as a general truth in Scripture. This then will open the more specific evidence for our particular form of fencing. We would argue on the basis of the following evidence that “open communion” without any fencing whatsoever is not only unbiblical but anti-biblical and dangerous. Continue reading

PROPER COMMUNION (1)

PMW 2024-081 by Kenneth L. Gentry, Jr.

INTRODUCTIONCommuinion 1

For the postmillennial hope to progress in this fallen world, the church needs to get her act together. We need a new Reformation. Contemporary worship has declined to such a deplorable level that her offering cheap entertainment rather than devout worship has diminished her influence in God’s world. One area (among many) wherein the church needs to return to her biblical standards is in the partaking of communion, i.e., the Lord’s Supper.

I will be offering a five-part study of the matter of “Proper Communion” as my contribution to this area of much need reformation. I hope you will follow me through this important study.

When I was pastoring and we celebrated the Lord’s Supper I made the following formal statement, which along with the minister’s personal call for participants to examine themselves, represented our method of fencing the Lord’s Table in the exercise of communion:

“We invite to the Lord’s Supper all who are believers in Christ, who are baptized members in good standing of an evangelical church, and who have been formally approved by church officers of an evangelical church to take communion.”

Continue reading

WHY JOHN WROTE TO ASIA MINOR

seven churches 2PMW 2024-080 by Kenneth L. Gentry, Jr.

In my orthodox preterist understanding of Revelation, I see the bulk of John’s drama (as it transpire on the historical plane) as largely focusing on the destruction of Jerusalem in AD 70. Many opponents of this strong Judaic focus complain that we cannot explain John sends Revelation to Asia Minor (Rev. 1:4, 11; 2:1–3:22). It would seem that the message should be sent to Jerusalem. Why did John send his message on the destruction of the temple and Jerusalem to Christians in Asia Minor? The seven churches were not only several hundred miles away from Jerusalem, but were in non-Jewish territory well outside of Jewish Palestine.

There are several reasons for John’s directing his seven letters (actually “oracles”) to Asia Minor. I will briefly summarize a few. Continue reading

THE LORD’S POSTMILLENNIAL PRAYER

Lord''s PrayerPMW 2024-079 by Kenneth L. Gentry, Jr.

The Lord’s Prayer in Matthew 6:9–13 is well-structured and beautiful, despite its being quite succinct. If we look carefully at it, we will discover in its structure marvelous insights into just how postmillennial it really is. It is much more postmillennial in orientation than many have thought. Let me explain.

YOUR KINGDOM COME

We all recognize the postmillennial potential for two of its dramatic petitions: “Your kingdom come” and “Your will be done on earth as it is in heaven.” These (and all the petitions in the Lord’s Prayer) are in the aorist imperative form. Thus, they express the urgency of the pleas and the fervent desires behind the petitions.

The petitions currently before us are two future-oriented petitions asking that God bring his kingdom to bear over all the earth (the kingdom of God is his sovereign reign). This will ultimately transpire, of course, at the Last Day at the Second Coming of Christ which brings about the Final Judgment. These history-ending acts will dramatically, permanently, and fully establish the consummate New Heavens and New Earth wherein dwells righteousness. Continue reading

DOES GOD OPPOSE ALCOHOL? (5)

Wine negative 5PMW 2024-078 by Kenneth L. Gentry, Jr.

This is my final installment in a series analyzing the leading Scriptures that are deemed to prohibit alcohol consumption. I will start with:

Isaiah 5:21–22

Woe to those who are wise in their own eyes,
And clever in their own sight!
Woe to those who are heroes in drinking wine,
And valiant men in mixing strong drink.

This passage calls down woes upon “heroes in drinking wine.” And rightly so. But clearly this does not universally condemn all wine drinking. This should be evident for a number of reasons:

First, as we have seen, abundant evidence from Scripture shows that wine may be consumed in a righteous manner and by righteous men — including even the Son of God. And Scripture does not contradict Scripture.

Second, we find these verses set in a larger judgment context, where the prophet condemns other normally acceptable practices. For instance, verse 8 calls down woe upon those who “join house to house.” Is multiplying real estate holdings always sinful? In verse 12 we learn that the Jews are attending banquets where music is produced “by lyre and harp, tambourine and flute.” Are public festivities involving music necessarily evil? Continue reading